Timeline History of National Certification in Massage and Bodywork

By /

This is a timeline of events created from the Documents in the Archives: History of National Certification

Comprehensive Timeline of National Certification

Here is a comprehensive timeline of national certification in the massage and bodywork profession, with citations from the source documents:

Pre-1988

  • 1958: The American Association of Masseurs and Masseuses (AAMM), which later became the American Massage Therapy Association (AMTA), required members to graduate from an AAMM school and pass a final exam, along with paying state fees and dues, and being sponsored by an active member.
  • Early 1970s: For a brief period, active AMTA membership was restricted to those who graduated from AMTA-approved schools.
  • Mid-1980s: Discussions began among massage educators about the need for a national massage credential, as licensure existed in only ten states and public acknowledgment of massage therapy’s value outside the alternative sector was low.
  • 1983 : M. Hungerford, the National Education Director of AMTA at the time, initiated the Membership Entrance Exam (MEE) as a means for people to test into the AMTA. Membership into AMTA required massage therapists to have graduated from an AMTA approved school. At the time there were only 15 approved schools in the US making it difficult to attend. The MME was created to test incoming members who were unable to attend an AMTA approved school. The MEE was not a psychometrically valid exam. It required a hands on test which was difficult to administer as testing was subjective. (From May 1993 Action Item: Examination of the AMTA Membership Entrance Exam submitted by: Kate Jeffery).
  • As far back as 1949: The concept of a “national examination” for massage practitioners was promoted by members of the American Massage Therapy Association. The idea progressed in the 1950s but didn’t gain traction until the mid-1980s when the AMTA and the profession of massage therapy saw a period of rapid growth. (National Certification Newsletter, Spring 1991)

1988

  • 1988: The American Massage Therapy Association (AMTA) officially authorized and funded the National Certification Program for Massage Therapists. AMTA loaned $150,000 to create the National Certification Board for Therapeutic Massage & Bodywork (NCBTMB) and a steering committee, with the money paid back by the end of 1996. At this time, there was no research conducted to determine if such a certification was needed for the profession. Hands On Fall 1989
  • 1988: Earliest promotional materials, including an 8-page booklet titled “Update on the National Certification Program for Massage therapists” and an informal brochure called “What is Certification,” were sent to all AMTA members.
  • 1988: The NCBTMB’s original mission statement was: “To foster high standards of ethical and professional practice in the delivery of services through a recognized credible credentialing program that assures the competency of practitioners of therapeutic massage and bodywork”.

1989

  • 1989: The intentions of the exam changed from being an AMTA entrance exam to a national exam. (From May 1993 Action Item: Examination of the AMTA Membership Entrance Exam submitted by: Kate Jeffery).
  • January 1989. Elliott Greene named project manager of the National Certification Exam Program. The National Certification Project will be initially guided by a National Steering Committee. Applications for the committee have been solicited and more than 70 applications have been received. “One of the first tasks of the committee will be to hire a nationally known and respected testing company that will, in concert with the committee, do the preliminary studies required (such as a job analysis) and the actual test development. Certification will be voluntary, and the certification program will be based on the objective development of an examination to be administered independently by a certification board. Eligibility to take the exam will be independent of Association membership or any other professional affiliation. The first administration of the new certifying exam is projected to take place in the Fall of 1991. “AMTA Hands On Fall 1989
  • April 1989: Sixty massage therapists signed and sent a joint initiative to AMTA to halt the certification process until more information could be gathered on its necessity for the profession; this request was rejected by AMTA. AMTA Hands On. Winter 1989
  • December 1989: A Steering Committee was appointed for the National Certification Program for Massage Therapists by the AMTA National Board of Directors. Over 2,000 “Update” report cards, representing a 23% response, were returned by December 5, 1989, regarding interest in certification. . AMTA Hands On. Winter 1989

“National certification will be an effective means of upgrading our professional status and standards. With national certification we will be taking a vital step in protecting our freedom to practice and having control over our future. Perhaps another great contribution we can make to our society is to show how we can demonstrate our abilities, yet remain true to our heritage and retain our caring values. National certification is healthy for everyone. “AMTA Hands On Fall 1989“

1990

  • January 1990: AMTA voted to have members remove the word “certified” from their membership certificates, replacing it with “this is to verify that (Name) is an active member…”. Hands On. 1990
  • Jan/Feb 1990: An advertorial entitled “Certification, Professional Development and Your Freedom to Practice Massage” appeared in the January/February issue of Massage magazine.
  • March 2-3, 1990: The second meeting of the National Certification Steering Committee was held.
  • May 1990: The Steering Committee declared its separation from AMTA.
  • May 4-6, 1990: The first meeting of the Certification Program’s Job Analysis Advisory Committee was held. The committee was composed of nine members from various professional backgrounds. The Job Analysis Advisory Committee is composed of the nine members of the Steering Committee and three additional persons to expand expertise and further broaden representation. These three individuals are: Jeffrey Maitland, Ph.D., (Scottsdale, AZ), Faculty Chair of the Rolf Institute and a practicing Rolfer; Mary Grassel, B.S., (West Allis, WI), a state officer of the International Myomassethics Federation(IMF) and a massage therapist who utilizes deep tissue work in her private practice; and Nandi Dubitsky, (Melbourne, FL), Chair of the Education Committee of the Florida State Massage Therapy Association (FSMTA) and a member of the American Oriental Bodywork Therapy Association (AOBTA). Hands On Summer 1990
  • June 1990: Item Writing Workshop for the Therapeutic Massage and Bodywork exam was scheduled, with participants to write test questions on subjects relevant to the Job Analysis Survey.
  • July 1990: The Job Task Analysis survey instrument was mailed to 6,930 AMTA members. The final version of the survey instrument was mailed in August 1990 with a postage-paid return envelope.
  • August-September 1990: A national survey of massage therapy/bodywork practitioners was conducted for the job analysis.
  • September 1990: The Council Meeting and Item Review were scheduled, where the Certification Council would finalize plans for eligibility requirements, develop bylaws, and review the Job Analysis.
  • October 1990: Results of the Job Task Analysis were published. The Job Analysis Advisory Committee met from October 10-14, 1990, in Orlando, Florida, and received the results of the Job Analysis survey from 6,930 massage therapists nationwide.
  • November 1990: The Steering Committee was selected to oversee the first phases of development of the project, with members chosen for their experience and knowledge in professional credentialing, and for committee balance in terms of various approaches to massage therapy/bodywork, geographic location, gender, and other factors. The Steering Committee also met twice in May and October 1990 to complete the job analysis and discuss issues related to National Certification Program.
  • December 1990: “A National Study of the Profession of Massage Therapy/Bodywork” (the Job Analysis Report) was conducted by Knapp and Associates for the Council of National Certification Program for Massage Therapists. This report aimed to establish a valid national credential, enhance professional respect, and provide self-regulatory guidance.

1991

  • January 1991: A final report on key entry-level massage skills and abilities, which included the information needed to develop the certification examination, was scheduled to be presented.
  • February 1991: The Steering Committee scheduled its first liaison hearing with the Federation of State Massage Therapy Boards for February 1, 1991.
  • Spring 1991: The National Certification Newsletter, Vol. 1, No. 1, was published, explaining professional certification and the activities of the Council. The newsletter noted the National Certification Program was officially authorized and funded by the AMTA in 1988.
  • Spring 1991: The National Certification Council met in San Diego in February 1991, holding first liaison hearings and discussing selection of a testing company for the certification exam and test specifications. The next meeting of the Council was scheduled for Fall 1991.
  • Spring 1991: The certification exam was expected to be administered for the first time in Fall 1991.
  • April 1991: The document “A National Study of the Profession of Massage Therapy/Bodywork” was made available through the AMTA Headquarters.
  • September 1991: The first-time administration of the National Certification Examination was scheduled for March 1992.
  • October 1991: The application deadline for the October 1992 test was announced.
  • November 1991: Field tests for the National Certification Examination were scheduled, to give three regional test pilots, the test format, and the length of testing time.
  • December 1991: National Distribution of Candidate Handbooks was planned.

1992

  • January 25, 1992: Psychological Corporation conducted field tests in five cities to help determine the final test format by providing valuable data on the questions.
  • June 27, 1992: The first National Certification Exam was administered. It consisted of 150 multiple-choice questions and cost $165.00. Rick Rosen, Executive Director of the Alliance for Massage Therapy Education, took one of these original exams.
  • Fall 1992: The National Certification Board for Therapeutic Massage and Bodywork (NCBTMB) was formed as an administratively independent affiliate of the American Massage Therapy Association. George Kousaleos, who chaired the National Certification Council, chaired the NCBTMB.
  • September 1992: The Candidate Handbook for the National Certification Board for Therapeutic Massage and Bodywork was available.
  • October 1992: The second National Certification Examination administration was scheduled.

1993

  • AMTA proposes that they drop the MEE and phase it out by Dec 1994. They sent a survey to 120 members in New Hampshire and 18 people responded. (From May 1993 Action Item: Examination of the AMTA Membership Entrance Exam submitted by: Kate Jeffery).
  • 1993: Magazine advertisements for national certification began, using slogans like “Show your commitment to excellence” and “over 13,000 Massage therapists and Bodyworkers can’t be wrong”.
  • April 1993: The NCBTMB was working toward NCCA approval. By this time, 2,098 certification exams had been administered, with 94% passing.

1994

  • November 1994: The NCBTMB incorporated separately from the AMTA.

1995

  • July 1995: The NCBTMB created a consumer awareness campaign in New York City.

1996

  • End of 1996: The initial $150,000 loan from AMTA to create the NCBTMB was fully paid back.

1999

  • August 1999: Representatives from various state massage regulatory agencies met to establish the National Alliance of State Massage Therapy Boards (NASMTB).

2000

  • October 23, 2000: The NCBTMB issued its Standards of Practice, providing guidelines for appropriate conduct and serving as a consumer bill of rights.
  • November 2000: Legislation passed allowing for reimbursement of professional certification fees up to $2,000 for veterans qualifying under the GI Bill, if the certification program met standards drafted by the Coalition for Professional Certification (CPC).

2001

  • March 1, 2001: Reimbursement for licensing and certification tests became available to veterans.
  • April 2001: The National Alliance of State Massage Therapy Boards (NASMTB) had been established in August 1999.
  • February 2001: The NCBTMB underwent its first major review of its Strategic Plan since its implementation in 1999, resulting in significant changes to prioritize strategies and enhance competency levels of massage therapists and bodyworkers.
  • June 20-21, 2001: New executive committee and board members were elected for the NCBTMB.

2002

  • May 18, 2002: Whitney Lowe officially took over as NCBTMB chairperson from Susan Scoboria.
  • September 2002-January 2003: The NCBTMB conducted a job-analysis survey to assess the importance of certain job-related tasks, knowledge areas, and skill sets for competent practice, sending surveys to 2,335 nationally certified practitioners.

2003

  • February 2003: The NCBTMB unveiled a continuing education approved provider program to work with its recertification requirements, offering 10 options for fulfilling continuing education, including 48 CE credits (minimum), 200 hours of hands-on work, and 6 hours of ethics every four years.
  • April 2003: The NCBTMB named new credentials: National Certification in Therapeutic Massage (NCTM) for entry-level massage-only competence, and National Certification in Therapeutic Massage – Advanced (NCTM-A) for advanced education and core competencies, while maintaining the combined National Certification in Therapeutic Massage and Bodywork (NCTMB).

2004

  • January 2004: Changes to the NCBTMB’s eligibility criteria for the National Certification Exam were announced at the AMTA’s Council of Schools meeting.
  • September 2004: The NCBTMB changed the composition of education hours required for the National Certification Exam, effective June 1, 2005. While remaining at 500 hours, specific requirements increased: anatomy, physiology, and kinesiology from 100 to 125 hours; pathology from 0 to 40 hours; and ethics from 2 to 6 hours.

2005

  • May 2005: ABMP hosted a meeting to discuss the formation of an alliance or federation of state massage therapy boards and the potential development of a new entry-level exam for massage licensing, concluding there was a need.
  • July 2005: The article “New Organization Formed to Benefit Massage Therapy” was published in Massage Today.
  • September 2005: The Federation of State Massage Therapy Boards (FSMTB) held its formative meeting in Albuquerque, New Mexico, before the annual AMTA convention.
  • November 2005: The Federation of Massage State Boards was created. There was a difference in opinion between ABMP (supporting regulation) and AMTA (warning against it) regarding the Federation’s creation.
  • November 2005: An editorial in Massage Today by Cliff Korn outlined the FSMTB’s vision to support state regulatory boards and enable reciprocity/portability, while noting AMTA’s concern that creating another exam would divide the profession.
  • February 2005: Two executive committee members of the NCBTMB, Judy Dean (board chair) and Neal Barry (chair-elect), abruptly resigned amidst reports of a divisive environment and power struggles on the board.
  • April 2004 – July 2005: Christine Niero, executive director for seven years, resigned in April 2004; Mark Green was appointed in July 2004 and quit six months later. Susan Nicholais served as interim executive director.

2006

  • January 2006: John Page, Executive Director of NCBTMB, was let go after 15 months, as NCBTMB relocated its staff from McLean, Virginia, to Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois.
  • March 21, 2006: The American Massage Therapy Association (AMTA) declared the National Certification Exam of Therapeutic Massage and Bodywork (NCBTMB) legally defensible after another organization (FSMTB) questioned its constitutionality.

2007

  • Early 2007: Complaints were levied against the NCBTMB board for allegedly acting inappropriately in dismissing two board members whose certifications had lapsed.
  • June 2007: Christopher Laxton was hired as NCBTMB CEO, aiming to position the board as an advocate for massage therapy and national certification. He replaced the “executive director” title with “CEO” to signify organizational maturity.
  • June 2007: The NCBTMB had developed the National Certification Exam for Therapeutic Massage and Bodywork and the National Certification Exam for Therapeutic Massage. 32 of 39 regulated states used or recognized one or both exams.

2008

  • May 30, 2008: The NCBTMB celebrated its 15th anniversary in Washington D.C..
  • June 2008: ABMP Chairman Bob Benson and President Les Sweeney visited NCBTMB headquarters, suggesting NCBTMB should revamp its existing certification program and get out of the licensing exam business, but were told there was no intention to do so.
  • July 21, 2008: The NCBTMB was conducting a nationwide search for a new CEO, and Laura Culver Edgar had been named interim CEO on June 26.

2009

  • 2009: The NCBTMB changed its mission statement to: “To define and advance the highest standards in the massage therapy and bodywork profession”.
  • September 2009: The NCBTMB announced a beta exam for Advanced Certification would go live on April 2, 2010, with the final exam slated for delivery before June. Massage Magazine on archive.org
  • October 2009: Les Sweeney of ABMP published the “Certifiable” article, commenting on the proposed advanced certification and reiterating ABMP’s view that NCBTMB should revamp its existing certification program for distinction rather than adding a second level.
  • June 30, 2009: News broke that the NCBTMB was launching a membership organization called the USA Massage Resource Association (USAMRA) to “strengthen the value of NCBTMB” by offering insurance and other benefits, automatically including its 91,000 certificants. They were also offering discounts on pizza and oil change services.
    From Laura Allen on www.massageprofessionals.com On June 9, Paul Lindamood, CEO, registered the domain name www.usamra.org (usaMassageResourceAssociation). This new professional association will be partnering with companies to provide “member benefits” in the form of discounts. Although the website isn’t up yet, according to my sources the list of potential discount offers would include those from massage-related companies and what the NCB’s memo referred to as “quality of life/enhancement.” While I enjoy a good pizza, I don’t know that I would go so far as to say it enhances the quality of my life. Before I get carried away about pizza or discounts at the Jiffy Lube, I should explain that this appears to be part of the master plan to turn the NCB from a certifying body to a membership organization, like our other major professional organizations, AMTA (American Massage Therapy Association) and ABMP (Associated Bodywork & Massage Professionals). What’s the point here? How will the services be different or better than those professional organizations that already exist (and incidentally, they co-exist peacefully)? Why do we need another professional association? I have no idea.”
  • July 2009: The American Massage Therapy Association (AMTA) expressed “disappointment” in the NCBTMB’s decision to create a membership organization, stating it was not in the profession’s best interest and would erode the value of certification. The NCBTMB clarified that the news of USAMRA was “prematurely disclosed” and changed the name to USA Massage Resource Alliance (usaMRA).
  • Nov 2009 – NCBTMB blog started to explain advanced certification.

2010

  • February 23, 2010: The NCBTMB announced it would exhibit at the Integrative Healthcare Symposium in New York City, highlighting evidence-based research on massage and its accredited exam programs.
    Press Release archive.org (PDF):
    NCBTMB TO PARTICIPATE AT 2010 INTEGRATIVE HEALTHCARE SYMPOSIUM OAKBROOK TERRACE, Illinois (February 23, 2010) – The National Certification Board for Therapeutic Massage & Bodywork (NCBTMB) announced that it will be exhibiting at the Integrative Healthcare Symposium in New York City, February 26-27, 2010.
  • April 2, 2010: The Advanced Certification beta exam went live.
  • November 15, 2010: NCBTMB announced the re-election of Michele Baker and election of Judy Silcock, Bruce Baltz, and Rhonda Reif to its Board of Directors.
  • December 2010: The NCBTMB announced it was creating a new “National Certification for Advanced Practice” credential to enable accomplished practitioners to differentiate themselves and facilitate hiring by employers in conventional and integrative healthcare.

2011

  • February 4, 2011: The NCBTMB was in the process of restructuring its Approved Provider/Continuing Education Program, seeking input from various stakeholders.
  • February 24, 2011: The NCBTMB Board of Directors confirmed the appointment of Leena Guptha, D.O., to a four-year open seat on the board. Massage Magazine on archive.org
  • April 7, 2011: The NCBTMB announced the results of the Job Task Analysis for the National Certification for Advanced Practice (NCAP). Massage Magazine on archive.org See the full report National Certification for Advanced Practice (NCAP)JOB ANALYSIS STUDY (PDF) Prepared for the: National Certification Board for Therapeutic Massage & Bodywork April 2011 Prepared by: Lynn C. Webb, Ed.D. Psychometrician

National Certification for Advanced Practice (NCAP)JOB ANALYSIS STUDY (PDF) The desire for such an advanced certification has been verified through various projects and studies over the last twelve years:
In 1997, Job Task Analysis survey respondents indicated a desire for advanced certification and specialty exams. In response, NCBTMB commissioned a Task Force, which then distributed a market research survey to stakeholders through the NCB Connections newsletter. When asked to respond to support the development of a “Masters” or Advanced Level of certification which recognizes higher levels of skill and experience than the current NCBTMB credential” almost two-thirds of the respondents agreed or strongly agreed. In 2000, a feasibility study for an advanced credential was undertaken. This further reinforced the idea, noting the need for a body of knowledge in order to proceed.
Shortly thereafter, in 2001, a Pre-Job Analysis Report for Advanced Certification was commissioned with an independent testing company to confirm the belief that a real construct exists for an advanced exam and credential. This was confirmed and in 2002 and 2003, further refining work was completed regarding task analysis and item development. In 2007, the Job Task Analysis again reflected that the profession desired a voluntary
advanced credential. Finally, in 2009, after review of these past efforts and confident that the desire for such a credential was evident, the NCBTMB Board of Directors decided to proceed with the creation of an advanced certification credential and exam. Nearly 7,000 practitioners responded to the Needs Assessment Survey, indicating that the interest in such a credential remains high. National Certification for Advanced Practice (NCAP)JOB ANALYSIS STUDY (PDF)

  • May 5, 2011: The Alliance for Massage Therapy Education offered a new vision for national certification, suggesting entry-level certification was unnecessary due to state licensure and advocating for NCBTMB to reposition its program as a graduate-level credential. They presented a three-step plan for NCBTMB reorganization, including relinquishing entry-level licensure testing, transitioning to a graduate-level National Certification, and sunsetting its Approved CE Provider program in favor of an FSMTB-administered program.
    THE ALLIANCE FOR MASSAGE THERAPY EDUCATION OFFERS NEW VISION FOR NATIONAL CERTIFICATION. Massage Magazine. “According to Rosen, “Now that we have licensure in most states, entry-level certification has been rendered unnecessary and redundant as a first credentialing step for those coming into the field. NCBTMB now has an excellent opportunity to upgrade and reposition its existing national certification program to a graduate-level credential.” See AFMTE’s Position Paper

“The lack of “portability” has resulted from a strategy of pursuing new licensure laws on a state-by-state basis over the past 20 years without the guidance of a model practice act to create parity among these regulations. This has occurred through efforts funded primarily by AMTA, which allowed state chapters to make autonomous decisions about the content and structure of their own legislation. What NCBTMB gained through this process was a disproportionate amount of power and influence, as its exam became the de facto “gatekeeper” for entry into the field in most jurisdictions.” AFMTE’s Position Paper

  • September 2011: Paul R. Lindamood stepped down as CEO of the NCBTMB. He was credited with refocusing the organization, reducing expenditures, and guiding the progress of the Advanced Credential. Press Release: archive.org

2012

  • January 2012: The West Virginia Public Employees Insurance Agency (PEIA) began requiring massage therapists to be nationally certified and insured to bill for services, influenced by input from NCBTMB and AMTA. Story on Massage Magazine on archive.org
  • March 14, 2012: The NCBTMB announced it was phasing out the National Certification Exam. “The new credential will require 750 hours of education, 250 hours of hands-on experience and passing of a criminal background check, according to an NCBTMB press release. Additional qualifications for this credential will be determined based on feedback from the profession. Previously, the board had announced plans to pursue the development of the National Credential for Advanced Practitioners, but “after extensive feedback from the profession, and a further look at the difficulty in testing the requisite knowledge, skills and abilities for such a level of practice, the exam was deemed inappropriate for the current needs of the profession,” the press release noted. Rather, it was discovered that higher standards for certification were desired, and the new Board Certification credential, soon followed by the development of specialty exams, will provide a pathway for career success.” Massage Magazine on archive.org
  • March 2012: The NCBTMB announced it would no longer pursue the development of the National Credential for Advanced Practitioners, instead shifting focus to higher standards for certification through a new Board Certification credential and future specialty exams. Massage Magazine on archive.org
  • July 2012: The NCBTMB announced new requirements for its new Board Certification, which included 750 hours of education. Massage Magazine on archive.org

2013

2014

  • October 2014: The Federation of State Massage Therapy Boards (FSMTB) and the NCBTMB reached an agreement: NCBTMB would no longer provide examinations for licensure purposes and would focus exclusively on quality certification programs. This supported the use of the Massage & Bodywork Licensing Examination (MBLEx) as the sole licensure exam for the profession, facilitating licensure portability.

2016

  • 2016: The NCBTMB officially ended its National Certification Exam.
  • August 2016: The NCBTMB launched an online store.
  • April 2016: Interim CEO Leena Guptha left the NCBTMB, and Steve Kirin resumed his role as CEO.

2017

  • March 2017: Teresa M. Matthews, LMT, CPT, BCTMB, was named Chair of the NCBTMB Certification Board.
  • April 2017: A “battle over control of CE” between NCBTMB and FSTMB intensified, with opinions against NCBTMB’s new CE approval program.
    Opinion: New CE Approval Program is a Bad Idea for Many Reasons April 12, 2017 Whitney Lowe
  • October 2017: Heart Touch partnered with the NCBTMB to offer a new curriculum for massage therapists dealing with chronic, debilitating pain.
  • Standards of Practice (Not sure if this was when they were created or just updated).

2018

  • Aug 3 2018 : NCBTMB Announces New Competency-Based Board Certification Requirements, Revised Exam

Burr Ridge, Ill. (August 3, 2018)—The National Certification Board for Therapeutic Massage and Bodywork (NCBTMB) announced today key changes to its Board Certification requirements and corresponding Board Certification Exam, effective immediately. To further align with healthcare professions and embrace similar competency-based criteria, NCBTMB announced the following new Board Certification requirements as of August 3, 2018:

  1. Graduate from a NCBTMB Assigned School
  2. Passing score on the NCBTMB Board Certification Exam
  3. Pass a criminal background check (performed by NCBTMB)
  4. Verification of current massage therapy state licensure
  5. Agree to uphold NCBTMB’s Code of Ethics and Standards of Practice

NCBTMB removed its previously mandated 750 hours of education and 250 hours of professional, hands-on work experience. ­­

2019

  • February 2019: Rebekah Owens, LMT, BCTMB, and Dolly Wallace, LMT, BCTMB, were voted onto the NCBTMB Certification Board, and Portia B. Resnick, LMT, BCTMB, was named President-Elect, effective March 1, 2019.

2020

  • December 21, 2020: The NCCA re-accredited the NCBTMB Board Certification in Therapeutic Massage and Bodywork (BCTMB®) designation for a five-year period, expiring April 30, 2025.

2021

  • December 2021: The NCBTMB announced it would be stopping its specialty certifications to focus solely on the Board Certification.

2023

At AMTA National Convention in 2023, they reported on the financial status of the NCBTMB.

2024

NCBTMB Strategic Plan (PDF)

July 21, 2024 – Security Breach Announced

2025

May 2025 – NCB TMB announces the results of the Job task Analysis.

NCBTMB Annual Exam stats.

Related Posts

Scroll to Top