Defining the Massage Therapy Profession

The massage therapy profession, despite its long-standing tradition and vital role in health and wellness, struggles with a fundamental issue: a lack of clear, consistent definitions for many commonly used terms. This linguistic ambiguity doesn’t just confuse clients—it hampers the profession’s credibility, hinders collaboration, and creates barriers to professional growth.

Let’s delve into some of these commonly misunderstood or misused terms, explore why they’re problematic, and discuss how this lack of clarity affects the massage profession as a whole.


Commonly Confused Terms

  1. BodyworkAnother term that adds to the confusion is “bodywork.” Often used as a catch-all phrase, it encompasses a wide range of practices, from massage therapy to modalities like Rolfing, Trager Approach, and craniosacral therapy. While “bodywork” is intended to reflect the holistic nature of touch-based practices, its vagueness can lead to misunderstandings. Clients might equate it with massage or assume it’s something entirely different, depending on their prior experiences or cultural background. For practitioners, using “bodywork” instead of “massage therapy” can sometimes blur the boundaries of scope of practice, especially in states with strict licensing laws for massage. Without a clear definition, the term risks being a double-edged sword—broadening appeal but also creating potential confusion and professional challenges.
    Origins and Appeal“Bodywork” emerged as a way to describe touch therapies that may not fall strictly under the label of “massage.” It encompasses a variety of practices, including Rolfing, Alexander Technique, Trager Approach, Feldenkrais, craniosacral therapy, somatic experiencing, and even energy-focused techniques like Reiki. For practitioners offering multiple modalities, using “bodywork” instead of “massage therapy” can feel more accurate or inclusive, particularly if their work emphasizes structural alignment, energy flow, or emotional release.Marketing Advantages and PitfallsUsing “bodywork” in marketing materials can appeal to clients seeking holistic or alternative approaches to wellness. The term often conveys a sense of depth, integration, and sophistication, which may attract clients looking for something beyond relaxation or pain relief. However, the vagueness of the term can also leave clients unsure of what to expect. For instance:
    • A client might book a session expecting a traditional Swedish massage but instead receive a somatic therapy.
    • Others might avoid the term entirely, fearing it represents practices outside their comfort zone.
    Legal and Regulatory IssuesIn states with strict licensing laws for massage therapy, the term “bodywork” can create legal challenges. Practitioners who use “bodywork” to market their services might unintentionally signal that they are not subject to massage licensing requirements, leading to misunderstandings or even fines. Conversely, some practitioners use “bodywork” to sidestep massage licensing requirements altogether, further muddying the waters and damaging the reputation of legitimate therapists.Professional IdentityFor the massage therapy profession, the use of “bodywork” raises questions about identity and scope. Should massage therapists embrace the term as part of a broader spectrum of therapeutic touch? Or does its use dilute the distinct professional identity that massage therapy has worked so hard to establish? Without clear guidance from professional organizations or licensing boards, the term remains a gray area, creating tension between inclusion and professional boundaries.To address these challenges, professional organizations and educators must take the lead in defining and contextualizing “bodywork” within the massage therapy profession. Clear definitions should distinguish when and how the term can be used, particularly in relation to licensing laws and scope of practice. Additionally, public education campaigns can help clients understand what “bodywork” means and how it differs—or aligns—with “massage therapy.”By defining “bodywork” more clearly and using it responsibly, the profession can retain its diversity while minimizing confusion. This balance will help establish stronger trust and respect among clients, other healthcare providers, and regulatory bodies.
  2. Deep Tissue Massage
    • Often marketed as an intense, pressure-heavy modality, “deep tissue massage” is one of the most misunderstood terms in the industry. Clients frequently associate it with painful experiences, and therapists themselves may have varying definitions based on their training.
    • The problem: Without a standardized definition, clients may have unrealistic expectations, and therapists may inadvertently reinforce stereotypes that massage is inherently painful.
  3. Medical Massage Therapy
    • This term implies a clinical focus, often tied to physician referrals or treatments covered by insurance. However, there’s no universal agreement on what constitutes “medical massage,” leaving practitioners and clients in the dark about its scope and standards. We have a long history of the confusing use of the term.
    • The problem: This ambiguity limits the profession’s ability to align with healthcare systems, making insurance reimbursement and integration into medical teams more challenging. When the term is not clearly defined by the profession itself, others like legislators and insurance carriers will define it for us.
  4. Manual Therapy
    • Borrowed from physical therapy, “manual therapy” typically refers to techniques involving hands-on manipulation of soft tissues or joints. Some massage therapists adopt this term to align with clinical practices, but its use is not uniformly accepted or understood.
    • The problem: It blurs the line between professions, risking both legal and professional misunderstandings.
  5. Certification vs Certificate
    • The distinction between earning a certification (a credential often tied to passing an exam or meeting specific professional standards) and receiving a certificate (typically awarded for completing a course or workshop) is poorly understood—even among therapists, state boards and legislators.
    • The problem: Misuse of these terms diminishes the value of true certification programs and can mislead therapists and employers about a practitioner’s qualifications. Many teachers/CE providers and massage schools are inaccurately providing what they are calling a certification when it is only a certifiate of completion.

How Lack of Clarity Affects the Profession

  1. Client Misunderstanding
    • Clients often enter a massage session with preconceived notions based on marketing language or anecdotes. When terms like “deep tissue” or “medical massage” are used inconsistently, it leads to disappointment or dissatisfaction, eroding trust in the profession.
  2. Professional Fragmentation
    • Massage therapy already suffers from a lack of unity among professional organizations, state licensing boards, and educators. Undefined or misused terms exacerbate this problem, making it difficult to create cohesive standards or advocate for the profession’s needs.
  3. Barriers to Insurance Reimbursement
    • Ambiguity in terms like “medical massage” and “manual therapy” makes it harder for insurance providers to recognize massage therapy as a legitimate healthcare service. This limits therapists’ ability to offer services to a broader range of clients and undermines the profession’s financial viability.
  4. Legal and Ethical Challenges
    • Misunderstood terms can lead to therapists working outside their scope of practice, either intentionally or inadvertently. This opens the door to legal repercussions and damages the profession’s reputation.

Solutions for a Clearer Future

  1. Develop Standardized Definitions
    • Professional organizations, educators, and practitioners must collaborate to create clear, universally accepted definitions for commonly used terms. For example, “deep tissue massage” could be redefined to emphasize depth of tissue engagement rather than intensity of pressure.
  2. Enhance Education
    • Massage therapy training programs should prioritize teaching the distinctions between these terms. Continuing education courses could focus on how to accurately describe techniques and modalities to clients and colleagues.
  3. Improve Public Messaging
    • Marketing materials, websites, and social media posts should use standardized definitions to avoid perpetuating confusion. Client education campaigns can help clarify what they can realistically expect from different modalities.
  4. Foster Interdisciplinary Communication
    • By aligning terminology with related professions like physical therapy or chiropractic care, massage therapists can enhance collaboration and mutual understanding while still preserving the unique identity of the profession.
  5. Leverage Professional Associations
    • Organizations like the AMTA, ABMP, and NCBTMB should take a leadership role in establishing and promoting consistent language across their members and stakeholders.

Conclusion

The massage therapy profession has an incredible opportunity to elevate its standing by addressing the confusion surrounding its terminology. By clarifying definitions, enhancing education, and promoting unity, we can build a more professional, respected, and accessible field. Let’s start by naming and defining our work in a way that reflects its true value and potential.

Scroll to Top